| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. The way ships move. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't know that realistic look is what we want. We need nice looking graphics that make us feel good about piloting Internet spaceships. The real orbital mechanics is not straightforward. Undocking from a station orbiting a planet won't even...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2010.04.08 19:35:00
|
2. What would happen if CCP only allowed one account per person? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
'if you could have only 1 account' That's still ambiguous, and is open to interpretations. áHere are 2 possible interpretations (both impossible and will never happen and therefore a purely mental exercise in logical extrapolation) and their cons...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2010.04.08 19:07:00
|
3. insurance & mineral prices for dummies - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Here's how I'm thinking about the market price of minerals. (I don't think this is original in any way). It's simply a balance between supply and demand. Anything you do to increase supply and/or decrease demand, price goes down. Decrease supply a...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2010.03.31 22:46:00
|
4. The Insurance Nerf... I Am Surprised No One Is Up In Arms About It Yet - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If CCP is serious about fixing the economy, how about balancing NPC budget? In other words, set sum of all NPC payouts (missions bounties, insurance payout, etc.) equal to sum of all NPC intakes (taxes, fees, sales of NPC goods). Yes, it will ...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2010.03.16 02:08:00
|
5. What else can/cannot be done with the zyphyr? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Any one know if Zephyr is easily scanned down given its small signature? ------------- Would you be ready if the gravity reversed itself?
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.12.19 00:46:00
|
6. is it just me or 750k m3 is f***ing insane for infrastructure hubs? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There seems to be a perception that the intention of Dominion is a kind of land grant. What Dominion does is to INCREMENTALLY lower the barrier to entry into 0.0 territorial game. Before Dominion, you had to create empty space by driving out th...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.12.04 08:10:00
|
7. I want visual contact in battle :( - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I agree this is a 'gap' in EVE gaming experience, and here's my idea to address it. (I guess this thread may now be moved to 'Features' section.) When you acquire target lock on enemy ships, in stead of getting a small static icon, have a little ...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.11.30 20:45:00
|
8. Need feedback on a solo Falcon fit - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
A few days back, I heard someone mention 'Blaster Falcon' on the forum. So I tried fitting one in EFT, as shown below. [Falcon, Blaster falcon] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II 10MN MicroWar...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.11.14 09:04:00
|
9. Why Eve Carebears are Just Plain Wrong - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm not sure if I agree with everything in OP, but the poster does highlight a relevant issue. The crux of the matter is this: should the game allow players to lose things they accumulated in game irrecoverably? Without mentioning labels, we hav...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.10.06 18:16:00
|
10. CCP it is a reasonable objection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Rumba Purring on 21/09/2009 14:53:03 I agree that aggression rules in empire are complicated and intentions behind them seem very inconsistent. However, whether this makes 'good' or 'bad' game play depends on preference. If you wan...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.21 14:52:00
|
11. Intaki V - a sight to see - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Looks nicer than the most. Still, it's Star Trek the Original Series quality graphics. I could almost imagine a Constitution Class Enterprise entering the view from side. ------------- Would you be ready if the gravity reversed itself?
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.18 21:36:00
|
12. Discussing: The Caldari Problem (RR BS) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I think OP has a valid point. Problem 1. 2 groups being compared: Group A: all armor-tanked RR BS's Group B: mixed armor-tanked and shield tanked RR BS's All things being equal, Group B is definitely disadvantaged in the amount of hit point r...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.17 17:01:00
|
13. caldari ships doesnt fit story line? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Their ECM technology is what sets them apart. If you think about it, inflicting damage, repairing damage, disrupting power generation, highlighting target, attenuating sensor signal-to-noise ratio, etc. are pretty low-tech / brute-force compared...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.14 20:20:00
|
14. Making isk. Mining Vs PvP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Here's another line of profession that fits your description. Originally by: Dreez Why the unbalance CCP ? Making isk running high sec L4 mission is like fishing in a bucket full of fish, and you can do it solo with ease, earning millio...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.12 16:23:00
|
15. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty--Breaking the Chains - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Aralis Obviously I'm not happy about this. I don't suppose anyone who understands how 0.0 empires work and is in one is. But that's a given - the patch is obviously designed to make life harder for 0.0 empires. How much hard...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.12 16:05:00
|
16. Huge concentration of fire: A problem? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Diminishing damage scaling with number of shooting ships as a general combat mechanic? What would be the role playing reason for such a thing? It would be so immersion-breaking and would require such a suspension of disbelief on the part of playe...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.11 14:16:00
|
17. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty--Breaking the Chains - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Bits of details the dev blog contains remind me of a very old game: Master of Orion (MOO). In MOO, in order to conquer an occupied space, 1) you had to send in a fleet of ships to defeat ships guarding the system (along with orbiting defenses) ...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.09 15:21:00
|
18. How useful are Blackbirds in PvP these days? Rooks? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Rumba Purring on 08/09/2009 05:48:12 Even better with these days with cheap medium ECM rigs. The recent patch was definitely a BB boost. You can get about jam strength of 10 with racial jammers, 12 if you overheat. ------------- Wo...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.09.08 05:46:00
|
19. How the new "Multi-Sized Rigs system" may or may not ruin pvp - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
BECAUSE OF BLACKBIRDS! Imagine an EVE universe where every T1 Blackbird cruiser is fitted with 2 ECM strength rigs. Good ECM on the cheap. ------------- Would you be ready if the gravity reversed itself?
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.08.21 04:05:00
|
20. Why PVP can be so painful, from a PVE perspective. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kashre I have this dream where you go to an agent, and instead of "hey there's 18 pirate battleships in this very system go kill them all with your battlecruiser", the agent says, "A madman in a Megathron named Dark Charity ...
- by Rumba Purring - at 2009.07.15 16:27:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |